Commenting Guidelines

    • The HSLF invites comments—pro and con. Keep them clean. Keep them lively. Adhere to our guiding philosophy of non-violence. And please understand, this is not an open post. We publish samplers of comments to keep the conversation going. We correct misspellings and typos when we find them.

« The 700 Club | Main | An Eye on 2014: Anti-Animal Politicians In the Mix »

Monday, April 01, 2013

Slaughtering Horses for Profit, Not Welfare

Ignoring the global horse meat scandal that’s thrown the industry into further disrepute, Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin signed legislation Friday lifting the state’s ban on processing and selling horsemeat, potentially setting the stage for Oklahoma becoming the first state in six years to open an equine abattoir. In signing the bill, which was opposed by horse advocates and rescue groups, Fallin wrongly compared horse slaughter to humane euthanasia, saying, “abuse is tragically common among horses that are reaching the end of their natural lives.”

It’s a false framing of the issue, because the horse slaughter industry is a predatory, inhumane enterprise. They don’t “euthanize” old horses—but precisely the opposite: they buy up young and healthy horses, often by misrepresenting their intentions, and inhumanely kill them to sell the meat to Europe and Japan. 

Horse meat scandalWhen horse slaughter plants previously operated in the U.S., according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 92.3 percent of the horses arrived healthy and in good condition. These are not the sick and lame and unwanted—they are horses that could have been rehomed and lived out a productive life. That is, if the “killer buyers” who gather horses from random sources and act as bunchers for the slaughter plants stop outbidding loving families and horse rescue groups at auctions, driving up the prices of healthy horses because they have the most meat and the most profit on their bones.

It’s a shame that Oklahoma politicians would want their state to line up in the race to be the first to kill Trigger and Mr. Ed, especially since two-thirds of Oklahoma voters oppose horse slaughter. But there is a long way to go before that happens, as USDA would have to approve a process for providing inspections at horse slaughter plants, creating an additional federal regulatory burden at a time of fiscal austerity. It may be a risky investment for any business that wants to slaughter horses, as there is increased scrutiny of the drugs and medications given to horses throughout their lifetimes, with no tracking of the substances since the animals are not intended for human consumption, and foreign markets such as Europe becoming more skeptical of doped-up horsemeat.

USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack recently called for “a third way” to deal with unwanted horses besides killing them and exporting their meat for human consumption. As noted in The Hagstrom Report, the Secretary “called on Congress to come up with other ways to handle aging horses than to slaughter for meat for human consumption…Vilsack said that horses might be used to help veterans who have returned from war, and noted that when he was governor of Iowa horses were used to work with inmates in prisons and that their use gave prisoners job skills when they got out.”

This is the kind of problem solving we need from our political leaders, and we should reject the same old tired thinking from those who trot out the Orwellian lines about killing horses to save them. We should reject the horse slaughter industry, just as we would reject a slaughter industry for dogs or cats gathered up under false pretenses and killed for export.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Slaughtering Horses for Profit, Not Welfare:

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Get Political
for Animals

Powered by TypePad