Commenting Guidelines

    • The HSLF invites comments—pro and con. Keep them clean. Keep them lively. Adhere to our guiding philosophy of non-violence. And please understand, this is not an open post. We publish samplers of comments to keep the conversation going. We correct misspellings and typos when we find them.

« New Legislation Would Protect Animals in Maine Laboratories from Severe Suffering | Main | 20 Years of Advances for Animals »

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

A Deadly Deal for Animals

The congressional backroom budget deal that stripped gray wolves of their Endangered Species Act protections was a shameful example of politics at its worst. And now we’re seeing the impact, as the state of Idaho puts measures in place to begin the trapping and aerial gunning of wolves, according to the Lewiston Tribune, as soon as this week. Not only did the White House and Congress sign off on eliminating federal species protection by legislative fiat, but now it appears that federal wildlife agents will actually be the ones to conduct the shooting of wolves from aircraft.

Bella
Bella, just two weeks before she died from deadly
poisons meant for wildlife yards from her family's
doorstep in central Texas. photo: Predator Defense

This is the same Wildlife Services program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture that has been wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars and recklessly killing animals with steel-jawed leghold traps, toxic poisons, aerial gunning, and other inhumane methods. The poisons, particularly Compound 1080 and M-44 sodium cyanide devices, are so deadly and indiscriminate that they have killed family pets like Bea while she was on a hiking trip on public land in northern Utah, and Bella just yards from her family’s doorstep in central Texas.

There is a legitimate case to be made for a federal agency that helps to solve wildlife conflicts, providing training and research on best practices with an emphasis on innovation and non-lethal solutions. But Wildlife Services in its current form is a relic of the past, exterminating wildlife as a government subsidy for private ranchers and other special interests, using inhumane and ineffective methods, while the U.S. taxpayers foot the bill.

Lethal control is often ineffective at protecting livestock, since other predators simply move in to the vacant territory. In some cases the money spent to kill predators is a greater cost than the value of the livestock losses sustained by ranchers. There are much more cost-effective and humane, non-lethal methods available, such as the use of llamas and other guard animals, lighting, penning, and other proven approaches. If policymakers are serious about cutting spending and reforming wasteful government programs, here’s a great place to start.

In all the clamor to de-list wolves, the rallying cry from western lawmakers was that wolf management should be turned over to the states. If that’s the case, why are they now asking the federal government to conduct the killing?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54fa1b0a18834015432194a31970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Deadly Deal for Animals:

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Get Political
for Animals




Powered by TypePad