Commenting Guidelines

    • The HSLF invites comments—pro and con. Keep them clean. Keep them lively. Adhere to our guiding philosophy of non-violence. And please understand, this is not an open post. We publish samplers of comments to keep the conversation going. We correct misspellings and typos when we find them.

« Liberty is Safe Again in Missouri | Main | Speak Up for PUPS »

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Measuring the Benefits of Ballot Measures

We’ve always known that statewide ballot initiatives have intangible benefits for the animal protection movement, in addition to getting new public policies enacted for animals. Thousands of animal advocates are trained in the political process when they gather signatures, knock on doors, or otherwise participate in campaigns. Millions of voters deliberate on animal protection issues when they walk into the voting booth and have to select “Yes” or “No” on a measure. Households across the state see images of factory farms, cockfighting, steel-jawed leghold traps, greyhound racing, and other issues through paid advertising and earned media, and gain a new-found appreciation for our struggles and for the plight of animals. 

Statewide ballot initiatives have intangible benefits for the
animal protection movement.

Now there’s a peer-reviewed study that confirms these findings. New research published in the Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization shows that publicity about California’s Proposition 2 in 2008 increased consumer awareness about animal cruelty in industrial egg production, dramatically increasing the demand for cage-free eggs and decreasing demand for eggs from caged hens.

In “The Effect of Proposition 2 on the Demand for Eggs in California,” Oklahoma State University professor Jayson L. Lusk investigates “the market effects of Proposition 2 by studying whether and how consumer demand for eggs changed in the months leading up to the vote in San Francisco and Oakland.” Lusk compared the purchasing habits of consumers in the Bay Area, where there had been heavy TV advertising by proponents and opponents of Prop 2, to those in Dallas, which had been unaffected by the campaign.

“The results suggest that the very act of putting an issue like Prop 2 on the ballot affects consumers’ preferences—likely because consumers are largely unaware of and have incorrect beliefs about modern agricultural practices,” Lusk concluded. The research shows that despite higher prices, demand for cage-free and organic eggs increased 180 percent and 20 percent, respectively, in response to news stories about Prop 2—even as demand for cheaper battery cage eggs in Bay Area retail markets dropped and overall egg demand was unchanged.

Ohioans for Humane Farms is now working to place a similar factory farming measure on the ballot in November, and Missourians for the Protection of Dogs has just submitted more than 190,000 signatures to qualify a measure cracking down on abusive puppy mills. If history is any guide, the millions of voters in these states will have the opportunity not only to pass laws that prevent animal cruelty, but also to vote with their wallets when they learn about the misery that animals experience every day on puppy mills and factory farms.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Measuring the Benefits of Ballot Measures:

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Get Political
for Animals

Powered by TypePad